In last few years the person enrages the Gu Cheng that make the same score Yao taller and taller, among them cultural relic also became serious attention point. However Japanese scholar points out smooth press tower of Gu Cheng the Song Dynasty " not agree with with the fact " , how is this to return a responsibility? (graph: Make the same score tower of Yao the Song Dynasty, photograph took the place of 1920, this company picture alls rights reserved)Actually this causes the tower of the Song Dynasty of controversy, from the Ping Yao of core Gu Cheng still has certain space. According to 1941 " Chinese culture historical sites " , "The village of Guo of look forward to that Ci Xiangsi is in 20 lis to the south of smooth Yao county, have anise 9 bricks tower, stand erect is in outside Ci Xiangsi in moor... " (graph: Detail of bricky tower bottom, photograph took the place of 1920, this company picture alls rights reserved)About tower of this the Song Dynasty make time, japanese scholar does not have controversy at that time, think " bricky tower is Ci Xiangsi build Yu Song between Dai Qing past years " . Those who cause controversy is the height of tower of the Song Dynasty. Before coming to China, japanese scholar is done sufficient homework, "" Shanxi records division | | | Want " says tower is tall 300 more than a unit of length " . Result Japan scholar comes, how is the likelihood 300 more than a unit of length? Do you know 300 a unit of length want much taller? (Song Dagao spends detail, photograph took the place of 1920, this company picture alls rights reserved)The view of 300 a unit of length, it is apparently " Shanxi annals abstract " exaggerative, be similar to Chinese Tang poetry " danger building is tall 100 feet " , be a kind cannot truer hyperbole is rhetorical, if Japanese Home Gu Jianxue feels really scientific to metric ancient books is recorded, that is right of course did not go up. (detail of tower of the Song Dynasty, photograph took the place of 1920, this company picture alls rights reserved)So tower of this the Song Dynasty after all much taller? According to 1941 " Chinese culture historical sites " , "Tower 9 class, tall 10 a unit of length " , this view more rely on chart some. (graph: Make the same score detail of tower of Yao the Song Dynasty, photograph took the place of 1920, this company picture alls rights reserved)